What was dzhokhar tsarnaev studying

Tsarnaev visited the gym and slept in his dorm room Wednesday, according to the school. Glasby said Tsarnaev, who was often referred to as Jahar, blended right back into normal college life and was "convincing" that nothing was amiss. We had a typical conversation, he was not startled, he was not scared, he was not anything.

He was just the same old Jahar," Glasby said. Glasby said that Tsarnaev offered to give him a lift home to Waltham, Mass. Tsarnaev described his car as a green Honda Civic, which was the same car police initially said Tsarnaev may have been driving while at-large.

Instead, Glasby spent Friday evacuating the campus, which sits about an hour south of Boston. A screeching fire alarm woke Glasby around 10 a. I only had time to grab my sweatpants and my sneakers," Glasby recounted. After the bombings, university officials said, he returned to campus for much of the week; students have said they spotted him at the gym and at a party. His friend Pariseau, 20, has found herself asking fellow students to take down vitriolic online comments.

Beginning Thursday night, investigators allege, Tsarnaev and his brother, Tamerlan, 26, shot to death an MIT police officer and engaged in a fierce battle with law enforcement officers in a nearby community that left Tamerlan dead. Police cornered Tsarnaev hours later in a suburban backyard as he hid in a boat.

He remains hospitalized. An ethnic Chechen born in Kyrgyzstan, Tsarnaev came to the U. His family settled in Cambridge, Mass. He rarely spoke of his heritage, said former teammate Sanjaya Lanichhane, 22, and always asked to be dropped off a block from his home when friends gave him rides.

Fellow students described him as bright. Riley Baxter, 19, was his partner in a freshman engineering class, where they worked on circuit boards and lighting projects. His recent academic performance, however, was lackluster. Outside class, friends said, he rarely discussed academics. While it is not the goal of this webpage to determine if Tsarnaev should have received the change of venue he has requested, it will remain important to review his arguments and reasoning, and examine the social science tools utilized by the parties in this case.

Perhaps the most extensive utilization of social science in this case was submitted by the Defense, which submitted data from a public opinion survey of four jurisdictions, as well as an expert report. The details of his study will be analyzed below. While most experts seems to think a change of venue should have been granted, there are some dissenting opinions. Other common arguments are that, with the national coverage given to the Boston Marathon bombing, no place in the United States will be completely devoid of jury prejudice.

We live in a world with a hour news cycle, and the countless avenues through which Americans receive their news only increase the chance that people have seen enough about Tsarnaev to have already made a decision on his fate.

A counter to that would be, if you are not going to change the venue of the Tsarnaev trial then is their any scenario where venue would be changed in that jurisdiction? There is no clear cut answer to most of these dilemmas, but strong arguments persist. Other high profile trials have taken place in the communities where they occurred. After the World Trade Center bombing in which killed six and injured over a thousand people, the six co-conspirators were tried in the Southern District of New York, even though the first change-of-venue motion was filed less than a year after the bombing.

On September 24, , the district court denied the motion. In its order, the court addressed the evidence and, after analyzing the Skilling standard, concluded that Tsarnaev failed to demonstrate that pretrial publicity rendered it impossible to find a fair and impartial jury in the District of Massachusetts. On December 1, , Tsarnaev filed a second motion to change venue, arguing that the need for a change of venue had increased because of continuing prejudicial publicity in the media and alleged leaks of information by government sources.

On December 31, , without waiting for the district court's written decision on the second motion, petitioner filed his first mandamus petition the Court of Appeals.

On January 2, , while the Court of Appeals continued to consider the mandamus petition, the district court issued its written decision on the second venue motion, noting that the new motion did not raise any genuinely new issues and concluding that no presumption of prejudice had arisen that would justify a change of venue. On January 3, , the Court of Appeals denied the motion to stay jury selection and the first petition, concluding that Tsarnaev had not made the extraordinary showing required for mandamus relief.

Bronson, United States v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev , D. Ultimately, the participants who responded in Boston ranked as the most prejudiced on all of the critical measures: case awareness, case knowledge, pre-judgment of guilt, case-specific support for the death penalty, and case salience. The target size for the venues surveyed was qualified interviews for the Boston area and for the other three sites. The random-digit-dialing system was used to obtain a likely representative sample of target population: the jury pool in that division or district.

The screeners were used to determine that respondents were jury eligible. The demographic questions were included in the survey so that we could compare the survey demographics with the demographics of the actual residents. Ever Partic. The study also examined the coverage in major newspapers in each of the four venue areas, the Boston Globe, the Springfield Republican, the New York Times, and the Washington Post. Although other media, including electronic, social media, and many other newspapers also covered the case, these newspapers were selected as major sources in the selected venues.

As can be seen from the above table, the number of newspaper articles collected from only the Boston Globe and covering a period of a bit less than 15 months is 2, That is extraordinarily high. By comparison, in the Oklahoma City Bombing case, there were 2, articles — some fewer than in this case, and that press collection involved a longer period of time, and there were multiple newspapers throughout the entire state, not just one newspaper in Oklahoma City.

Nature of Coverage The four elements in that hierarchy are publicity that is 1 inflammatory, 2 inadmissible at trial, 3 inaccurate, and 4 likely to generate a presumption of guilt. The survey done in this case showed that in the four venues surveyed, almost two-thirds Q7f,